Journal
Guest Blog: The Centaur Drinks From The Fountain (Julian Walker)
April 18, 2007 18:14

The following is being posted according to Ken's generous offer.  The posting of a submission doesn't imply that Ken or the editors of this site necessarily agree with any or all of it.  Thanks, -Eds

 

from http://www.julianwalkeryoga.zaadz.com/

A love that spans a thousand years? An Indiana Jonesian quest to find the secret of immortality? A New Age reincarnation tale?

Darren Aronofsky's new film The Fountain will doubtless generate as much confused complaint as it will epiphanic praise. Welcome to second tier cinema. In his third outing, Aronofsky follows up Pi and Requiem for a Dream with a mind-bending trip that exposes the doomed "immortality project" at the center of both science and religion and the importance of coming to terms with the existential reality of death.

2006 was thick with new age offerings that included The Da Vinci Code, The Way Of the Peaceful Warrior, Down the Rabbit Hole (What the Bleep Part Two), The Celestine Prophecy and The Secret. These films promise to be uber-revelatory but serve up either Green reinterpretations of Amber literalized myth (Da Vinci), awkward mélanges of junk science, metaphysics and ‘prosperity consciousness' that add up to Magenta in Orange/Green drag (Rabbit Hole, Secret) or oversimplified regressive Green in bed with Magenta magical thinking (Prophecy, Warrior).

Well, so much for the popular spiritual renaissance in cinema.

Where the previously listed films overlook interior transformation or stagewise growth, attempting instead to just translate a static stage into cool spiritual language, or to find unlikely scientific exterior referents for misunderstood mysticism or mythic literalism, watching The Fountain is an exercise in integral consciousness. It uses a narrative style that requires the viewer to flex and flow between the three different realities and follow a story that appears at first to be stretching across a thousand years, but is really happening within the interior psyche of Dr. Tommy Creo.

In so doing Aronofsky transcends and includes several historical worldviews and arrives at a uniquely contemporary conclusion. Listen to his dialog with Stuart Davis on IntegralNaked here:

http://in.integralinstitute.org/search.aspx?keyword=aronofsky

In the film, we find ourselves shifting back and forth between three stories that follow Hugh Jackman (Tommy) and Rachel Weisz (Izzy) in different guises and timeframes.

First: the desperate research and experimentation of a contemporary cancer doctor to find a cure for his dying wife, who has a fascination with all things Mayan.

Second: the story (penned by the wife) of a Spanish conquistador on a quest to save his queen from the sadistic and self-righteous grand inquisitor by adventuring to the Mayan Amazon in search of the Biblical Tree of Life atop a hidden sacrificial pyramid. Success will ensure not only eternal life for both but also his Queen's undying love.

Third: a futuristic astronaut/meditator floating through space toward a dying star he hopes will grant his dead wife's rebirth.

Confused?

This is in essence a simple story about an issue with extremely complex ramifications - the acceptance of death. By metaphorically spanning a thousand years, the film is able to offer multiple perspectives on this key issue. Layered and psychologically rich, The Fountain uses death and our psychological struggle to accept it as the thread that unites the different stories.

The conquistador scenes give us a window into Izzy's fascination with mythic consciousness and the regressive fantasy that an earlier, Mayan version of religious literalism might free her alter-ego queen from the horrors of 16th century Christianity. Here, Aronofsky astutely compares inquisition era Christianity to the creeping cancer of a brain tumor while suggesting a bloody mirror-image correspondence with the Mayan cult of human sacrifice.

It is in the shaven-headed, isolated future-Buddhist sequences that we enter most deeply into Tommy's pain, and ultimately, resolution. Taken together, it is Aronofky's riff on the mirrored blood-soaked Mayan and Christian cosmologies, contrasted with Creo's hubris in insisting that science be a way to "stop aging, stop death" that gets us into the nuts and bolts of the dilemma at hand. The tension explodes and is resolved in, of all places, the interior anguish of the doctor's meditation.

It is this final meditative representation of the inner journey into outer space and how the three stories culminate that will doubtless be confusing to a culture sadly unfamiliar with interiority.

The Fountain uses a fluid narrative structure that traverses Red/Amber secret Mayan knowledge and Biblical references, Green/Teal postmodern Buddhist overtones, the regressive Green fantasy of death-transcending love and an Orange scientific immortality project - all to finally land us squarely in the camp of Teal existential, post-metaphysical acceptance of the reality of death.

Don't be fooled by the trailer, this is an existentialist meditation on the human condition dressed up as new age science fiction. The surprise ending subverts heroic transcendentalism in favor of the bittersweet and ultimately transformative heart-rending of deep love and loss.

My only question is this: Following his bald adventures in death meditation, will Hugh Jackman be added at the top of the list to play Ken Wilber opposite Jennifer Aniston's Treya in the movie version of Grace and Grit?

 

Vertline-top
Vertline-bottom



« recent entry | return to index | previous entry »


  © 2015 Ken Wilberhome | what's new | professional | personal | cultural | social | cool stuff site design by ursa minor